FTB issues Notice to Retroactively Deny "Qualified Small Business Stock" Tax Benefits. Amended Returns Should be Filed.

By Matthew Richardson

A California appellate court recently held as unconstitutional the California statutes extending the benefits of selling “qualified small business stock” (QSBS) to California taxpayers. In Cutler v. Franchise Tax Board (2012) 208 Cal. App. 4th 1247, the court held that the QSBS exclusion and deferral statutes – California Rev. & Tx. Cd. §§ 18038.5 and 18152.5 – discriminated against non-California corporations and therefore violated the Commerce Clause of the U.S. Constitution.

As a result of the Cutler decision, the California Franchise Tax Board has determined that these statutes are now invalid and unenforceable and that an appropriate remedy is to deny the exclusion and deferral to taxpayers who benefited from them.

In FTB Notice 2012-03, the FTB has announced that it will allow the exclusion and deferral with respect to the sale of stock of all corporations meeting the tests under the statutes (not just the corporations meeting the unconstitutional 80% California payroll and property tests) – but only for years beginning before January 1, 2008. For those few taxpayers whose pre-2008 tax years are still open, and who otherwise meet the QSBS exclusion or deferral tests, a claim (or protective claim) for refund is available.

However, for all tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2008, all taxpayers will be denied the exclusion and deferral for California state income tax purposes. Those taxpayers who benefitted from the exclusion or deferral will be notified by the FTB, and additional taxes (and interest) will be assessed; estimated tax penalties may also apply. Affected taxpayers should consider filing amended returns.

The FTB’s FAQs can be found at the following link: https://www.ftb.ca.gov/law/Qualified_Small_Business_Stock_and_Cutler_
Decision.shtml
.

This development has no impact on the federal QSBS exclusion and deferral, which remain in effect.

Neither the content on this blog nor any transmissions between you and Sheppard Mullin through this blog are intended to provide legal or other advice or to create an attorney-client relationship.

In communicating with us through this blog, you should not provide any confidential information to us concerning any potential or actual legal matter you may have. Before providing any such information to us, you must obtain approval to do so from one of our lawyers.

By choosing to communicate with us without such prior approval, you understand and agree that Sheppard Mullin will have no duty to keep confidential any information you provide.
Post A Comment / Question






Remember personal info?


Send To A Friend Use this form to send this entry to a friend via email.