Relief for Securitization Vehicles: Mortgage Modification under Foreclosure Prevention Programs

In a recently-issued Revenue Procedure (Rev. Proc. 2008-28), the IRS states that the modification of certain mortgage loans under foreclosure prevention programs involving, for example, interest rate reductions, principal forgiveness, extensions of maturity and alterations in the timing of changes in an interest rate generally will not cause the IRS either to challenge the tax status of certain securitization vehicles that hold the loans or to assert that those modifications create a liability for tax on a prohibited transaction. This relief is granted to real estate mortgage investment conduits (REMICs) and investment trusts where the mortgage loan meets all of the following conditions:

Continue Reading Questions & comments


403(b) PLAN EMPLOYERS MUST ACT SOON

Section 403(b) annuity plans have historically been governed by a hodgepodge of Internal Revenue Service ("IRS") rulings and regulations dating back to 1964.  In 2007, however, the IRS finalized new, comprehensive regulations that are generally effective January 1, 2009.  Schools and tax-exempt employers that maintain 403(b) plans and their advisors must thoroughly review and revise their plans to comply with the new regulations.  The consequences of not doing so are dreadful (i.e., the loss of tax-deferred status of employer and employee contributions to the annuity plan).

Continue Reading Questions & comments


Retailers Face Surge of Lawsuits Over Asking For Zip Codes During Credit Card Transactions and Requesting Personal Information During Merchandise Returns

California's Song-Beverly Credit Card Act prohibits the requesting and recording of personal information in connection with credit card transactions. The statute provides for civil penalties "not to exceed two hundred fifty dollars ($250) for the first violation and one thousand dollars ($1,000) for each subsequent violation . . ." Recently, two new trends in Song-Beverly litigation have emerged: (1) plaintiffs have filed suits against retailers over requests for zip codes; and (2) plaintiffs have sued retailers for requests for personal information during credit card return transactions.

Continue Reading Questions & comments